Warning: Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.

A chilling warning sign posted on the entrance of a rural property has sparked widespread concern and outrage among local residents and authorities. The sign, which reads "Warning: Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again," has been described as "disturbing" and "alarming" by many, who are questioning the legitimacy and safety of the property's security measures.

According to local reports, the sign was posted on the entrance of a large, privately-owned farm in the countryside, which has been the site of several reported incidents of trespassing in the past. While property owners have a right to protect their land and assets, many are arguing that the warning sign's graphic and threatening language crosses a line.

"It's just not right," said Jane Doe, a neighbor of the property who wished to remain anonymous. "I understand that the property owners want to protect their land, but threatening to shoot people is just excessive. What if someone accidentally wanders onto the property? What if it's a kid? They're essentially saying that they will take a life without hesitation."

Local law enforcement officials have confirmed that they are aware of the situation and are currently investigating the matter. "We take all reports of potential threats to public safety seriously," said a spokesperson for the county sheriff's department. "While property owners have a right to defend their property, we will be reviewing the situation to ensure that it is being handled in a responsible and lawful manner."

The property owner, who has not been named, has thus far declined to comment on the situation. However, a lawyer representing the owner's interests has released a statement arguing that the warning sign is a legitimate exercise of the property owner's rights. "The property owner has a duty to protect their land and assets," the statement read. "The warning sign is a clear and lawful attempt to deter trespassers and protect the property owner's interests."

Despite this, many in the community remain unconvinced. "This is not just about property rights," said Tom Johnson, a local resident who has organized a petition calling for the sign to be removed. "This is about human life and safety. We need to ensure that our community is a place where people feel safe and welcome, not threatened and intimidated."

As the debate over the warning sign continues, authorities are urging residents to exercise caution and to respect the property owner's rights while also prioritizing public safety. The incident has also sparked a wider conversation about the limits of property rights and the role of law enforcement in ensuring community safety.

In related news, a local advocacy group has announced plans to hold a rally in support of community safety and against what they describe as "vigilante justice." The rally is scheduled to take place next weekend and is expected to draw hundreds of participants.

The incident has left many in the community on edge, wondering what other measures property owners might take to protect their land and assets. As one resident noted, "If they're willing to put up a sign like that, what's to stop them from taking action? We need to take a stand and make sure that our community is a safe and welcoming place for everyone."