"To know Edina is to reject it." - Dudley Riggs, "The Year the Grinch Stole the Election"
In the heart of Minnesota, nestled along the banks of the Mississippi River, lies the affluent suburb of Edina

In the heart of Minnesota, nestled along the banks of the Mississippi River, lies the affluent suburb of Edina. With its manicured lawns, upscale boutiques, and highly rated schools, Edina is often regarded as the epitome of suburban bliss. However, according to Dudley Riggs, a wry observer of the human condition, "To know Edina is to reject it." This quote, taken from his satirical tome "The Year the Grinch Stole the Election," has become a rallying cry for those who see beyond the town's polished façade.
For Riggs, Edina represents a paradox – a community that prides itself on being progressive and open-minded, yet simultaneously shuns anything that challenges its comfortable status quo. He argues that Edina's residents, despite their affluence and privileged position, are driven by a peculiarly Midwestern insecurity. This insecurity, Riggs posits, stems from a fear of being seen as different or, heaven forbid, unrefined.
One need not look far to see the evidence of Riggs' claims. Edina's city council has been known to reject proposals for innovative housing developments, opting instead to preserve the town's homogeneous character. The local business community, while thriving, is criticized for its lack of diversity and reluctance to support entrepreneurs who don't fit the mold. Even the town's celebrated arts scene has been accused of being overly insular, favoring established artists over newcomers.
Riggs' critique of Edina has sparked both outrage and introspection among its residents. Some have dismissed his comments as the ramblings of a crank, while others have taken them as a wake-up call. For instance, local business owner, Sarah Johnson, acknowledges that Edina can be stifling. "I've lived here my whole life, and it's only when I left for college that I realized just how... uniform everything is," she says. "It's like there's an unspoken rule that you have to fit in, or else."
However, not everyone agrees with Riggs' assessment. Edina's Mayor, James Ross, counters that the town's reputation for being stuffy is undeserved. "We're proud of our community's history of innovation and inclusivity," he says. "Edina has always been a place where people come to pursue their dreams, and we're committed to maintaining that spirit."
Despite such defenses, Riggs' words continue to resonate with many who feel stifled by Edina's conformist atmosphere. His critique has, in effect, become a Rorschach test for the town – a prompt that reveals as much about the observer as it does about Edina itself. As one resident, Rachel Lee, puts it, "Riggs' quote made me realize that I've been living in a bubble. I'm not sure I want to reject Edina entirely, but I do want to challenge it – to push it to be more than just a pretty face."
In the end, Riggs' barb may have done Edina a favor, forcing its residents to confront the complexities of their own identity. Whether or not they choose to reject the town's traditional norms, one thing is certain – Edina will never be seen in the same light again. As Riggs himself quips, "You can't hate what you don't understand, but you can certainly reject what you do." For Edina, the question now is: what will it do with this newfound self-awareness? Only time will tell if the town will take Riggs' critique to heart and strive for a more inclusive, diverse, and vibrant community, or if it will continue to cling to its established ways.
Edina's residents now face a difficult decision: do they take Riggs' commentary as constructive criticism or dismiss it as sour grapes? Can they find a way to balance their desire for community and tradition with the need for innovation and progress? One thing is clear: Edina stands at a crossroads, and the path it chooses will determine the course of its future. With Riggs' words still echoing in their minds, Edina's residents must now decide what kind of community they want to build – one that is inclusive and diverse, or one that remains stuck in its traditional ways.
The implications of Riggs' statement extend far beyond Edina's city limits. As a commentary on modern American life, "To know Edina is to reject it" speaks to the tension between tradition and progress, between community and individuality. It challenges readers to consider the consequences of their own desires for comfort and security, and the ways in which these desires can sometimes lead to stagnation and complacency. As such, Riggs' critique of Edina serves as a catalyst for a broader conversation about the kind of communities we want to build, and the values we want to uphold. By examining Edina's flaws and imperfections, we may just discover a more authentic, more compassionate, and more vibrant vision of community – one that is worth embracing, rather than rejecting.