Rule of Creative Research: 1) Never draw what you can copy. 2) Never copy what you can trace. 3) Never trace what you can cut out and paste down.

In an intriguing turn of events, the art world is abuzz with a new set of guidelines known as the "Rule of Creative Research." This unconventionally simple set of rules is causing a stir among artists, designers, and enthusiasts alike. Developed by a group of acclaimed creatives, these three guidelines are seen as a significant shift in approaching artistic techniques and methodology. rule number one, "Never draw what you can copy," challenges the traditional facets art, encouraging artists to scrutinize the need to meticulously hand-draw subjects that can be easily reproduced through printing or digital means. This rule has sparked debate, with some hailing it as a doorway to creative efficiency, while others view it as a potential gateway to losing the art of hand-drawn techniques.

The second rule, "Never copy what you can trace," takes the maxim of originality a step further. By promoting the use of original sketches and avoiding the temptation to replicate works precisely, the rule aims to push artists towards genuine creativity. However, it has also raised questions about the role of copying in the process of mastering artistic techniques. Some critics argue that tracing is an integral part of learning, while proponents of the rule insist it fosters a deeper understanding of composition and form.

Perhaps the most contentious rule is the third, "Never trace what you can cut out and paste down." In the age of digital collage and easy access to graphic software, this rule throws down the gauntlet to artists to create without relying heavily on pre-existing images. This restriction aims to encourage artists to focus on their own unique visual language rather than repurposing existing imagery. Despite criticism that this might limit artistic expression, fans of the rule suggest it can lead to a more organic and original body of work.

The rules have stirred conversations across various platforms, with artists sharing their interpretations and implementations. Social media accounts dedicated to art and design have become hubs of discourse, showcasing projects and criticizing rule adherence. Art institutions have also joined the conversation, hosting workshops and lectures to dissect the implications of these guidelines. For now, the future of these rules remains uncertain. Will they revolutionize creative processes or fade away as a fleeting trend? The art world watches with bated breath, ready to embrace a new creative revolution or defend the existing values of artistic creation. As the dialogue continues, we await the evolution of these rules and their impact on the future of art and design.