Is a computer language with goto's totally Wirth-less?

In the world of computer programming, a question has been debated for years among developers and language enthusiasts. Is a computer language with 'goto's totally Wirth-less? This phrase, derived from the programming language Wirth, a pioneer in the area of programming languages and the creator of several influential languages including Pascal and Modula-3, is often used to express disapproval or criticism of the use of 'goto's in programming practices. 'Goto's, short for "goto," is a control flow statement that transfers the program flow directly to a designated label, bypassing the normal sequence of statements.

The Wirth-less phrase is meant to evoke the image of Wirth's own language, Pascal, which is renowned for its clean and concise design principles, avoiding the use of 'goto's altogether. However, the question of whether a language that includes 'goto's is indeed "Wirth-less" is more complex than it initially seems.

Some argue that languages with 'goto's are inherently flawed or unprofessional, as they can lead to code that is difficult to understand and debug. Proponents of this view point that the use of 'goto's is a crutch that programmers rely on to avoid the tedious process of writing conditional statements, thus leading to sloppy code.

However, others argue that 'goto's have their place in certain situations, such as handling errors or implementing certain types of loops. For example, in some situations, the use of 'goto's can be more efficient than using a loop, especially when dealing with very large datasets that do not fit into memory. Additionally, 'goto's can be used to simplify complex code or to reduce indentation.

Moreover, some programming languages, such as C and C++, have made 'goto's a part of their syntax. This has led to a widespread acceptance of 'goto's as a viable tool in the programming toolkit, rather than a last-resort or an admission of defeat.

The question of whether a language with 'goto's is Wirth-less is ultimately subjective and depends on the context and the specific use case. However, as the programming languages continue to evolve, it is possible that the role of 'goto's will become even more nuanced, and their use will be more judiciously evaluated.

Some developers have taken to arguing that the term "Wirth-less" is overly simplistic and dismisses the complexity of programming languages. They suggest that a language with 'goto's can still be well-designed and maintainable, provided that it is properly implemented and used in a context that minimizes the use of 'goto's.

In the end, while the question of whether a language with 'goto's is indeed "Wirth-less" remains a matter of debate, it is clear that the use of 'goto's is a topic of ongoing discussion and reflection within the broader programming community.