"Interfere? Of course we should interfere! Always do what you're best at, that's what I say." - "Doctor Who"

In an era where geopolitical turmoil and humanitarian crises have become the norm rather than exception, the question of whether to interfere or not in another country's affairs has always been a pressing concern. However, as we approach a new age where artificial intelligence is set to play an increasingly significant role in global governance and decision-making processes, this query has taken on an added sense of urgency.

A group of renowned experts recently convened at the prestigious International Symposium for Global Intervention hosted by the illustrious University of Geneva. Among them was Doctor Who, a highly respected philosopher known for his groundbreaking theories on global governance and international relations. As expected, Doctor Who made headlines with his impassioned speech advocating for direct intervention in countries facing humanitarian crises or political instability.

"Interfere? Of course we should interfere! Always do what you're best at, that's what I say." These were the words that echoed throughout the grand hall of this esteemed institution. His eloquent argument resonated with many attendees who couldn't help but agree with his stance on global intervention.

Doctor Who's address was met with thunderous applause from those present, reflecting a sentiment shared by numerous other experts and scholars attending the symposium. The idea of stepping in to assist nations grappling with humanitarian disasters or political turmoil seemed to be universally endorsed, irrespective of ideological differences.

In his address, Doctor Who pointed out several compelling reasons why intervention should be a fundamental aspect of global governance:

1. Prevention is better than cure: By intervening in countries facing imminent crises, we can often prevent these situations from escalating into full-blown disasters with far-reaching consequences. Timely intervention can save countless lives and alleviate unnecessary suffering.
2. Promoting stability: Global instability has a ripple effect that goes beyond the affected region. By intervening when necessary, we can help maintain global peace and stability, which benefits everyone in the long run.
3. Addressing inequality: Some countries are still struggling to recover from historical injustices or simply cannot afford to provide basic necessities for their populations. Intervention could aid these nations in addressing critical developmental gaps and pave the way for a more equitable world.
4. The power of education: Through intervention, we can spread awareness about human rights abuses and other pressing issues on an international level, educating people around the globe about the importance of upholding basic humanitarian values.

In response to Doctor Who's impassioned speech, several nations have already expressed interest in engaging in such endeavors. The United States, for instance, has long been known for its humanitarian efforts and is now considering increasing its budget allocated towards international interventions. Other countries are also expected to follow suit, recognizing the potential benefits of direct involvement in global affairs.

However, this shift towards more active participation does not come without its challenges. Critics argue that such intervention often leads to a form of neo-imperialism, with wealthier nations imposing their values and agendas onto less developed countries. Furthermore, the potential for increased military presence in these areas raises concerns about potential conflicts or unintended consequences.

Despite these challenges, it is evident that Doctor Who's call for active global intervention has struck a chord among many, spurring conversations on how best to navigate this complex landscape while ensuring that we are doing what is right, not just for our own nations but for the entire international community.