God did not create the world in seven days; he screwed around for six days and then pulled an all-nighter.

In a controversial and humorous take on biblical lore, a popular author and self-proclaimed 'cosmic humorist' has sparked worldwide debate with his unconventional interpretation of the world's creation

God did not create the world in seven days; he screwed around for six days and then pulled an all-nighter.

In a controversial and humorous take on biblical lore, a popular author and self-proclaimed 'cosmic humorist' has sparked worldwide debate with his unconventional interpretation of the world's creation. In his recently published book, the author, who prefers to remain anonymous, asserts that God did not create the world in six days and rest on the seventh, as biblically anecdoted, but rather 'screwed around' for six days before pulling an 'all-nighter' on the seventh.

The intriguing theory has acquiesced both laughter and outrage, with supporters finding the analogy amusing and relatable, while critics condemn it as blasphemous and disrespectful. The author, in an interview with a major news network, explained that his intent was not to mock or misconstrue religious beliefs, but rather to provoke thought and discussion about humanity's interpretation of creation and divine involvement.

The book, titled 'Divine Prankster: A Cosmic Joke of Creation,' expounds on the author's notion that God, being an eternity-old being, would likely exhibit human-like behaviors, such as procrastination and last-minute rushes. He suggests that the six 'AYS' (days) as biblically described could actually mean epochs, with God taking six indefinite periods to create and observe the universe, and only 'pulling an all-nighter' on the seventh to put the finishing touches and make it 'very good' as mentioned in Genesis.

The author further posits that the 'all-nighter' could also symbolize a sudden, intense focus from God to bring order out of the chaos described in Genesis 1:2, akin to a last-minute cram session. This interpretation aligns with some scientific theories that suggest the universe was shaped rapidly in a process known as 'instantaneous cooling and expansion.'

Critics, however, are not amused. They argue that the author's interpretation belittles the omnipotence and omniscience of God, reducing Him to a flawed, human-like figure. Some even suggest that the book's contents could be interpreted as a direct attack on religious beliefs and sacred texts.

Despite the backlash, the author remains steadfast, maintaining that his interpretation is not a refutation of religious beliefs but an invitation to explore them, to question, and to find personal truth within the Bible's poetic narratives. He encourages readers to view his work as a humorous and thought-provoking exercise, not a denouncement of faith.

Whether seen as heresy or hilarious hearsay, the author's unique perspective on creation has undoubtedly sparked conversation and viral sharing across social media platforms. Love it or loathe it, 'Divine Prankster' has certainly earned its place in the modern debate about faith, science, and human interpretation of divine actions. As the author cheekily remarked, "Maybe God laughed when He saw 'Let there be light.' Maybe that's the cosmic joke we're all part of."